History

Holy Roman Emperors: From Charlemagne to Francis II

History · Published 2026-10-19

A plain stone throne at the top of six stone steps inside a dimly lit cathedral gallery
The marble throne of Charlemagne in the upper gallery of Aachen Cathedral, where German kings were enthroned for six centuries.

The Holy Roman Emperors ruled, at least in title, over a patchwork of lands in central Europe for about a thousand years. The line is usually counted from Charlemagne's coronation on Christmas Day 800, or from Otto I's in 962, and it ended when Francis II laid down the crown on 6 August 1806.

What the title meant

The emperor claimed to continue the authority of the ancient Roman emperors in the West, with a special role as protector of the Church. In practice his power depended on the princes, bishops and cities of the Empire, most of whom ran their own territories. A ruler normally went through two steps: election as King of the Romans (in German lands, by the leading princes) and coronation as emperor, for centuries performed by the pope in Rome.

The word "holy" (sacrum) was first attached to the empire under Frederick I Barbarossa in 1157, as part of his argument that imperial authority came directly from God rather than through the pope. The fuller form "Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation" appears in the late 15th and early 16th centuries.

How emperors were chosen

Kingship in the Empire was elective, though powerful families often managed to keep it for generations. The Golden Bull of 1356, issued by Charles IV, fixed the rules and named seven prince-electors:

The college later changed. During the Thirty Years' War the Palatine vote was transferred to the Duke of Bavaria; the Peace of Westphalia in 1648 created a new eighth electorate so that the Palatinate could have one again. Hanover became a ninth electorate in 1692, confirmed in 1708.

Key emperors at a glance

EmperorImperial datesWhy remembered
Charlemagnecrowned 800, d. 814Crowned "Emperor of the Romans" by Pope Leo III in St Peter's, Rome, on 25 December 800.
Otto I, "the Great"crowned 962, d. 973His coronation on 2 February 962 is often taken as the start of the Empire proper.
Henry IVcrowned 1084, deposed 1105Clash with Pope Gregory VII over who appointed bishops (the Investiture Controversy); the penance at Canossa in 1077.
Frederick I Barbarossacrowned 1155, d. 1190Long struggles with the Italian cities and the papacy; drowned in Anatolia on the Third Crusade.
Frederick IIcrowned 1220, d. 1250King of Sicily, patron of learning, repeatedly excommunicated.
Charles IVcrowned 1355, d. 1378Issued the Golden Bull; made Prague an imperial capital.
Frederick IIIcrowned 1452, d. 1493The last emperor crowned by a pope in Rome; secured the title for the Habsburgs.
Maximilian Ifrom 1508, d. 1519Took the style "Elected Roman Emperor" without a papal coronation, with the pope's approval; his successors followed suit.
Charles Vcrowned 1530, abdicated 1556Last emperor crowned by a pope, at Bologna in 1530; ruled Spain, the Netherlands and much of Italy as well.
Charles VII1742–1745A Wittelsbach of Bavaria: the only break in Habsburg tenure after 1438.
Francis I1745–1765Husband of Maria Theresa, who as a woman could not hold the imperial title herself but held the Habsburg lands.
Francis II1792–1806Proclaimed himself Emperor of Austria in 1804 and dissolved the Holy Roman Empire on 6 August 1806, under pressure from Napoleon.

The table is a selection, not a complete list. Some rulers were elected King of the Romans but never crowned emperor; Rudolf I, the first Habsburg king (elected 1273), is the best-known example.

The Habsburg centuries

From the election of Albert II in 1438 the title stayed in the House of Habsburg almost without interruption until the end, the exception being Charles VII between 1742 and 1745. The Habsburgs also ruled Austria, Bohemia and Hungary in their own right, so the imperial crown sat on top of a much larger family power. That combination helps explain why, after the Reformation and the Thirty Years' War, the Empire looked increasingly like a legal framework for hundreds of semi-independent states rather than a single kingdom.

"Neither holy, nor Roman, nor an empire"

The most quoted verdict on the Empire comes from Voltaire, who wrote in his Essai sur les mœurs (1756) that the body which called itself the Holy Roman Empire was in no way holy, nor Roman, nor an empire. It is a good line and a fair description of the 18th-century reality, but historians today tend to stress what the Empire did achieve: courts that settled disputes between rulers, a framework that protected small territories from larger neighbours, and, after 1648, a lasting if uneasy coexistence between Catholic and Protestant states.

Common trivia traps

Quick quiz: Holy Roman Emperors

Sources